Front Page All Articles Recent Changes Random Article

Contents

Concatenative language

  • ACL
  • Ait
  • Aocla
  • Breeze
  • Cat
  • Cognate
  • colorForth
  • CoSy
  • Deque
  • Elymas
  • Enchilada
  • ETAC
  • F
  • Factor
  • Forth
  • Freelang
  • Gershwin
  • Joy
  • Kitten
  • lang5
  • Lviv
  • min
  • mjoy
  • Mlatu
  • Ode
  • Om
  • Onyx
  • Plorth
  • Popr
  • Porth
  • PostScript
  • Quackery
  • r3
  • Raven
  • Retro
  • Staapl
  • Stabel
  • Trith
  • Worst
  • xs
  • XY
  • 5th
  • 8th

Other languages

  • APL
  • C++
  • Erlang
  • FP trivia
  • Haskell
  • Io
  • Java
  • JavaScript
  • Lisp
  • ML
  • Oberon
  • RPL
  • Self
  • Slate
  • Smalltalk

Computer Science

  • Type systems
  • Language paradigms
  • Compilers
  • Interpreters
  • Garbage collection

Meta

  • Search
  • Farkup wiki format
  • People
  • Etiquette
  • Sandbox

Factor/To do/GC

  • weak pointers
  • weak hashtables
  • finalizers
  • incremental gc
  • Distant future: parallel GC, concurrent GC

If we go with immix, here's the plan:

  • Implement mark-sweep(-compact), which will be used for the large object space (necessary since immix can't handle large objects)
  • Implement a mark-region collector without evacuation or lines for small objects
  • Implement evacuation
  • Implement lines

done

  • promote objects to tenured after a certain number of collections (or in some other way improve generational strategy because aging space thrashes)
  • id-hashcode
  • mark/sweep for oldest generation--what kind of compaction should be used?
  • - plain old mark-compact
  • - the compressor
  • - mark-copy
  • - Immix
  • Card marking for parts of arrays
  • card marking for code heap to speed up collect_literals

This revision created on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:54:27 by slava

Latest Revisions Edit

All content is © 2008-2023 by its respective authors. By adding content to this wiki, you agree to release it under the BSD license.